Which process ensures the appropriate execution and follow-up of both invasive and noninvasive procedures?

The process that ensures the appropriate execution and follow-up of both invasive and noninvasive procedures is the universal protocol. The universal protocol consists of steps designed to prevent wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-person surgery. This protocol encompasses a series of critical checks before the start of any procedure, including identifying the patient, marking the site, and conducting a pre-procedure verification process.

While options like surgical review, blood and blood component usage, and infection review are important in the overall quality and performance improvement landscape, they do not specifically address the comprehensive protocol needed to ensure correct procedures and follow-up for both invasive and noninvasive interventions. Surgical review focuses more on the evaluation of surgical outcomes rather than the preventative measures taken prior to procedures. Blood component usage pertains specifically to the management of blood products and their safe administration, and infection review deals with controlling and preventing infections rather than the procedural safeguards in place for ensuring correct execution.

Thus, the universal protocol is critical in guiding healthcare teams through the necessary steps for safe procedure execution, making it the most appropriate choice in ensuring compliance and safety in both invasive and noninvasive settings.