Which of the following is a consequence of limited stakeholder engagement in quality improvement initiatives?

Limited stakeholder engagement in quality improvement initiatives often leads to resistance to new practices. When stakeholders, such as staff, patients, or community members, are not adequately involved or consulted during the planning and implementation of quality improvement efforts, they may feel alienated or apprehensive about the changes being proposed. This can result in a lack of buy-in from these individuals, making them resistant to adopting new processes or methodologies that could benefit the organization.

Engaging stakeholders is critical because it fosters a sense of ownership and accountability. When people feel their opinions and insights are valued, they are more likely to support and embrace changes. Conversely, ignoring their perspectives can breed skepticism and fear, leading to pushback against the initiatives aimed at improving quality and performance. Therefore, resistance to new practices becomes a significant consequence of limited engagement, as it undermines the collaborative effort necessary for successful quality improvement.